Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Reaction Paper: Catching Fire

Catching Fire (2013) is the second in a quartet of film adaptations based on Suzanne Collins’ wildly popular The Hunger Games trilogy. Starring Jennifer Lawrence and Josh Hutcherson, and directed by Francis Lawrence, it details the aftermath of the titular Hunger Games, which are an annual competition wherein twenty-four young men and women from each of the twelve Districts of Panem must fight each other to the death. Specifically, it deals with the effects these Games have on the winners of the 74th Hunger Games, Katniss Everdeen and Peeta Mellark, and the subsequent build-up into the 75th Hunger Games.

Although the genre of science fiction is often difficult to define, I do think that this film falls well within that umbrella. Collins— and, in translating her vision to the big screen, Lawrence— constructed a fictional world wherein science and technology play essential roles in the intersection of characters and their environments. The additions Collins made are similar enough to our own era’s that the difference is not too jarring, but they are nonetheless beyond our present technological capabilities: the high-speed, fully-equipped bullet trains connecting each district to the Capitol, the literally incendiary costumes designed by Cinna, the hovercrafts lifting tributes to and from the Games, and the Arena itself, are all examples of the technology essential to both plot and character arcs, and which in addition enrich the fictional landscape of the film.

The narrative itself is a clear commentary on present human society. The country of Panem is a dystopian future with clearly defined hierarchies. All twelve Districts are simply producers and manufacturers, providing the opulent Capitol with food, luxury goods, and entertainment in the form of tributes. As a metaphor for the excesses of capitalism, it could certainly do worse; indeed, there is something almost Marxist in Collins’ treatment of class and oppression within her work. Besides this treatise on economic disparity, the series is also a critique of our obsession with reality television and celebrity culture, which in the film literally dehumanizes the young tributes by pitting them against each other as objects for the amusement of Capitol citizens.

It is difficult to say whether the interaction between science, technology, and society in this series can be counted as a success or failure. If one looks at the technology within The Hunger Games as a means to an end, then certainly it is a success; children are ferried to their deaths quickly and efficiently, and their slaughter is broadcasted for absolutely everyone’s entertainment. As human beings with empathy, however, this same technology is clearly horrifying and aberrant, and for this part society is clearly at fault. Basically, the moral behind Panem’s cautionary tale is clear: with the interrelationship of science, technology, and society, what matters is temperance, not excess.

2011-02507
NARCISO, Luisa Mariel A.

STS THX

No comments:

Post a Comment